-
Kidnapper executes victim in front of sheriff’s deputies in Chino Hills, authorities say - 3 hours ago
-
Tampa Bay Buccaneers Over/Under Win Total: Will They Bounce Back In 2026? - 3 hours ago
-
U.S. economy slowed in second quarter, but consumers continue to spend - 4 hours ago
-
SoCal has had ‘so many heat waves,’ but this next one is a doozy - 9 hours ago
-
FTC sues Hims & Hers, alleging it shared people’s health data with Meta and Snap - 10 hours ago
-
George and Amal Clooney evacuate southern France home in wildfire - 10 hours ago
-
Russian attacks on Ukraine kill several; possible Russian missile crashes in Poland - 10 hours ago
-
Battling wildfires across Europe - 12 hours ago
-
Trump announces plans for sprawling Dulles Airport makeover - 13 hours ago
-
What your internet provider and websites can track when you browse - 13 hours ago
Orange County demands $4 million from GKN Aerospace after crisis

Orange County is demanding that GKN Aerospace, the company whose Garden Grove facility sparked a chemical crisis that prompted wide evacuations across six cities, pay more than $4 million to cover costs stemming from the emergency.
The multimillion-dollar bill is meant to reimburse the county for costs incurred while dealing with the incident, which forced about 50,000 residents to flee as firefighters warned that a 7,000-gallon volatile chemical tank was at risk of exploding or causing a major spill.
In a letter sent Friday demanding payment, county attorneys called the May 21 incident a “catastrophic failure” of the company’s chemical storage tank cooling system.
“This incident was clearly not an unforeseeable accident as GKN has a well-documented history of regulatory violations at the site dating back over a decade,” states the letter, which was obtained by The Times.
The company, according to county attorneys, faced California Division of Occupational Safety and Health citations and more than $900,000 in fines from the South Coast Air Quality Management District for past offenses.
GKN Aerospace officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday.
In May, a pressurized tank of methyl methacrylate began to fail at the company’s facility in Garden Grove. The chemical inside the tank continued to dangerously heat, and the cooling system at the facility was unable to reduce the temperature.
A crack was found in the tank, and fire officials said it was at risk of either leaking or exploding as internal pressure continued to build.
The incident has already prompted several inquiries, including by federal authorities. In June, the FBI served warrants at the facility. GKN officials at the time said they were cooperating with the investigation.
“The blame for this disaster lies solely with GKN and the county should not be bearing the brunt of these expenses,” Orange County Supervisor Janet Nguyen said in a statement.
The letter to the company included an itemized list of costs incurred by county agencies during the emergency, including $2.7 million by the Orange County Sheriff’s Department, more than $233,000 by the county executive office and $195,000 by the county’s Health Care Agency. It also included $500,000 of discretionary funds that supervisors allocated to assist affected residents.
Additional expenses incurred by the Orange County Fire Authority — estimated at $2.8 million — were not included in the $4-million total.
“The county works hard to stay in excellent fiscal shape and now we have 10 agencies with huge expenses along with OC Fire Authority,” Nguyen said. “We need reimbursement.”
GKN had previously pledged more than $3 million to nonprofits, including the OC Community Resilience Fund launched by the United Way, to help residents and business owners.
But in the letter to GKN executives, the county argued that the donation did not absolve the company of liability or of costs incurred by taxpayers.
“The County demands immediate financial accountability to mitigate the impact caused to the County’s public emergency resources,” the letter states.
In the letter, county attorneys also requested that the company maintain all records, materials and physical evidence related to the incident because of possible future litigation.











